Insights Perspective

AI did not kill software. It killed the excuse.

AI made software easy to copy. That puts every SaaS renewal up for review.

For decades, software was protected by one simple thing: it was hard to copy. That protection is gone.

In October, Kotaku reported that hundreds of classic games and emulators had been rebuilt with AI in a couple of weeks, some running in a web browser and described as “borderline flawless”. If a twenty-year-old game can be reverse-engineered in weeks, so can a project management tool.

Investors saw it coming. In early February, after Anthropic launched AI tools that could take on work people once paid subscriptions for, software stocks lost roughly $285 billion in value in a single day. A Jefferies trader gave it a name: the “SaaSpocalypse”.

The worry was simple. If one AI agent can do the work of five people, a company may need one software seat instead of five.

Illustration of five software seats reduced to one when an AI agent does the work of five people, with two figures: $285 billion wiped off software stocks in one day, and Klarna's $2 million saving after leaving Salesforce.
The seat example is an illustration. Sources: Long Angle (February 2026 selloff), Bloomberg (Klarna).

Now companies are doing the maths themselves. Klarna dropped Salesforce for data tools it built in-house with AI, and its chief executive later said the switch saved about $2 million.

The same thinking is now reaching everyday tools. A senior figure at a large PR firm told KalTech the firm had replaced Monday.com with its own AI-built version, saving around $4,000 a month.

That is the real threat to SaaS. Not that every tool gets replaced, but that every renewal now gets a second look: keep paying, or build the parts the team actually uses.

But copying a tool is not the same as owning one. A subscription quietly covers things a homemade version has to handle alone: security updates, backups, bug fixes and someone to call when something breaks at midnight. A clone that saves $4,000 a month can cost far more the day it exposes client data.

There is also a line worth drawing. Rebuilding the features a team needs for internal use is one thing. Copying another company’s product, design or code and passing it off as original is another. AI makes both easy. Integrity decides which one a business does.

So SaaS is not dying. The lazy version of it is: tools priced per seat, packed with features nobody uses and protected only by being hard to build.

The software that survives will have to earn its fee every single month. And companies building tools in-house will need to treat that code with the same care as any product carrying the company’s name.

Copying has never been easier. Doing it responsibly still takes judgement.

Sources